zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
4 comments
1. SpicyL+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2020-03-31 16:55:44
“Union busting” is a pretty vague term. There’s no legal issue with a company hating unions or trying to prevent a union from forming, as long as they don’t prevent employees from talking or retaliate against them for it.
replies(2):
>>kitana+k6
>>walshe+sp
◧
2. kitana+k6
[view]
[source]
2020-03-31 17:29:08
>>SpicyL+(OP)
That may be true, but in this instance there is clear evidence that Mr. Smalls was retaliated against for his labor organizing actions.
replies(2):
>>toaste+Nd
>>missed+z41
◧◩
3. toaste+Nd
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2020-03-31 18:02:29
>>kitana+k6
Allegedly.
◧
4. walshe+sp
[view]
[source]
2020-03-31 19:01:00
>>SpicyL+(OP)
Actually its has a particular meaning in US labour law
◧◩
5. missed+z41
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2020-03-31 23:02:34
>>kitana+k6
"Mr. Smalls was retaliated against for his labor organizing actions"
This is actually quite unclear
[go to top]