zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. Americ+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-03-30 22:19:16
As Amazon or any of these other companies aren’t organisations devoted to the study of epidemiology or medical expertise, the only thing they can possibly do is follow the guidelines/regulations imposed on them. I’m not sure what that has to do with compensation though.
replies(1): >>david_+86
2. david_+86[view] [source] 2020-03-30 23:20:30
>>Americ+(OP)
You're talking compensation not going up because too many people want the jobs and Amazon employees quit or strike because of COVID-19 working conditions so it's all connected.

I appreciate that you either can't see that or don't buy it so I end my participation here having tried to make the point as clear as I could. That is not a sly way of saying "I'm right, you're wrong" by the way. I am just out of words and ideas and time to re-express the relationship again.

Very best to you.

replies(1): >>Americ+U7
◧◩
3. Americ+U7[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-03-30 23:37:39
>>david_+86
Your thesis seems to be that the conditions that would lead these workers to strike would be sufficient to also deter all of the millions of newly unemployed people. A proposition which is unfounded and completely defies logic. Your question about how these companies should ensure business continuity with the threat of their workers getting sick is both unrelated to remuneration, and not a question those companies are in a position to answer themselves. That responsibility would fall upon a regulating body.
[go to top]