zlacker

What if I disagree with their characterization of the situation and I'm perfectly happy with my working environment?

>>derisi+(OP)
> What if I disagree with their characterization of the situation and I'm perfectly happy with my working environment?

Then it's clear you don't support their demands. You're siding with management and not your fellow coworkers.

That's fine, just know that your choice doesn't fully support their demands and is hurting their movement.

>>EarthI+F
And what if their movement is hurting my employment, and thus my livelihood? The attitude you're suggesting is basically holding me hostage to your demands, regardless of if they're reasonable or not.

>>derisi+X1
Can you give an example of a movement that would hurt your employment?

>>chicke+W4
Any movement where continuing my expected duties considers me a "scab" and views me in an unfavorable light, simply for showing up, doing my work, and providing for my family. Under your description, that covers any movement

>>derisi+78
Yes, but the goal of any movement is once the demands are met, it should be a net positive to you. Can you give an example of a movement, where if the goals are met, it will be a net negative to you?

>>chicke+6b
This assumes the outcome is indeed positive. What if the striker and scab disagree on this, though? What if someone believes the strike will result in lost jobs or closure of the company?