zlacker

Interesting -- what's the basis for this distinction? Unions make sense for the dumb masses in low-end jobs, but not for smart professionals like yourself?

>>jfk13+(OP)
I think the common argument is that unions tend to flatten pay disparities among workers. if you're currently recognized as an outstanding performer and compensated accordingly, you might expect to lose out under unionization. not saying this is necessarily true (or untrue), just that this is what people think. in fields where productivity varies less by skill, you would tend to see less of this objection.

>>leetcr+81
Both police unions and teachers unions are well known for fighting against performance based pay.

>>jfk13+(OP)
Unions bring everyone toward the average. So, it's not in my interest.