zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. pergad+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-03-17 08:32:50
It's not the that ruined them, but we see another classic transfer from the state (=people) to the wealthy.

The correct thing would be to nationalise them if they go bankrupt, not to bail out the investors that earned money with the explicit expectation of risk.

And I say that having lost 10k in stock value in the past month. Still my fault and my risk and I don't deserve to be bailed out for it.

replies(2): >>himinl+k >>mav3ri+qe
2. himinl+k[view] [source] 2020-03-17 08:36:52
>>pergad+(OP)
It's a form of insurance payment, wherein the insurer of last resort (the state) covers what private insurers don't because they can't.

No insurance policy covers war. This is pretty much like a war. It's uninsurable because it affects everyone.

Bailouts in 2020 are not gifts to the reckless rich like in 2008, they're like the Marshall plan.

3. mav3ri+qe[view] [source] 2020-03-17 11:26:53
>>pergad+(OP)
Every time things are nationalized, people eventually clamor for privatization. Govts can rarely run corporations.
[go to top]