zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. daeken+(OP)[view] [source] 2019-12-07 02:47:20
It's 45% bigger in area, rather than to a side (~4x overall area) like most people think when they see "double FOV". It's an improvement, yes, but not one that actually substantially changes its utility. If I could trade my Magic Leap for my old Hololens, I'd do it in a heartbeat.
replies(2): >>leetro+K2 >>tigers+2b
2. leetro+K2[view] [source] 2019-12-07 03:38:42
>>daeken+(OP)
I like the “goggle” frame of the ML better than the HL1. I am excited to try a HL2 and see how much more the FOV improves over the HL1. I hated the postage stamp feel of the HL1.
3. tigers+2b[view] [source] 2019-12-07 06:19:34
>>daeken+(OP)
No, it’s not. Hololens was 30 x 17.5 degrees, Magic Leap one is 40 x 30. Ignoring the solid angles and just naively multiplying the two dimensions we have 525 vs 1200. Two me the FOV area seems well above the double.
[go to top]