zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. Dylan1+(OP)[view] [source] 2019-12-06 20:59:44
The original product is still vaporware.
replies(1): >>fastba+lb
2. fastba+lb[view] [source] 2019-12-06 22:25:45
>>Dylan1+(OP)
Pretty sure they had an original product that was definitely not vaporware, the issue is it turned out to be not scaleable at all.

A product that is obscenely expensive and therefore can't be sold as a consumer device is not vaporware.

replies(1): >>Dylan1+Om
◧◩
3. Dylan1+Om[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-12-06 23:58:10
>>fastba+lb
A prototype is not enough to stop something from being vaporware.

Edit, to people that disagree: Did they have an even half-finished form? Did they offer it for sale?

Was it "announced to the general public but never actually manufactured nor officially cancelled"?

Vaporware doesn't always mean it's a scam. Sometimes it means there were intractable tech problems. Coming out with a fundamentally different product doesn't negate the missing product.

replies(2): >>fastba+6T >>lostga+7w3
◧◩◪
4. fastba+6T[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-12-07 09:37:32
>>Dylan1+Om
Except you can buy the Magic Leap One.

They promised light-field AR goggles, and you can buy light-field AR goggles.

replies(1): >>Dylan1+rE1
◧◩◪◨
5. Dylan1+rE1[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-12-07 20:08:05
>>fastba+6T
So there was an "original product" that was "not scaleable", "obscenely expensive" and "can't be sold as a consumer device", right?

If we distinguish the magic leap one as a different product, then from what I can see the original qualifies as vaporware.

◧◩◪
6. lostga+7w3[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-12-09 00:12:03
>>Dylan1+Om
In this sense, was Duke Nukem Forever still vapourware in the sense that it didn’t end up being whatever the original game would’ve been?
[go to top]