zlacker

[parent] [thread] 0 comments
1. crumpe+(OP)[view] [source] 2019-08-08 21:11:02
> but something that's viewed to be scientific fact.

By who? Do you seriously read an HN comment that states something you didn't already know with a citation you don't bother to click and then just go forward assuming it's scientific fact?

I don't even take publications themselves as scientific facts until they have been reliably reproduced or provide ample evidence.

[go to top]