zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. jasim+(OP)[view] [source] 2019-08-08 16:45:57
The political discussions that make their way into HN are very US-centric and that excludes me and countless others who actively participate here. A lot of such discussions are not real enough to me - they are problems of a much more privileged world. If we were to have truly political discussions, we'll need to include all the other countries of the world, which none of us would want. There are other places where political conversations are dime a dozen, but no other place like HN for technology, and things that "gratify one's intellectual curiosity".
replies(3): >>mikemo+QH >>rossda+IO >>dosy+uF1
2. mikemo+QH[view] [source] 2019-08-08 21:13:12
>>jasim+(OP)
I was shaking my head in disagreement, until I read:

> If we were to have truly political discussions, we'll need to include all the other countries of the world, which none of us would want

That's a really, really good point, and I'll keep it in mind when political topics arise.

replies(1): >>ckris+aM
◧◩
3. ckris+aM[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-08-08 21:40:49
>>mikemo+QH
I do think it is an underappreciated point, but also arguably why politics should be part of discussions. Not having to talk politics is really something that is earned. It is when you have a solid enough foundation to your field or profession that you feel secure enough in to not have to address it. In computing or software, we don't really have that. So people run out of vocabulary rather quickly, ending up in arguments like nationalism or free speech because there often isn't an intermediate layer of something like regulation or duty that you can be discussed by everyone. That is ultimately more a factor of the "everything goes" attitude, because if "everything goes" everything is also relevant to the discussion.
4. rossda+IO[view] [source] 2019-08-08 21:58:08
>>jasim+(OP)
Hear, hear. The job of HN is not to discuss every topic worth discussing. It is to discuss those topics (intelligently) which few (if any) other places on the internet have discussion of by an informed group.
5. dosy+uF1[view] [source] 2019-08-09 09:07:10
>>jasim+(OP)
That's like saying because we can't fix everything, we should fix nothing.

There's no need to include everything. HN is selective. It's in English. The reason it can't have posts about the responsibility of SV towards the tech and social impact they make is because that would pierce the veil of fake narrative that supports SVs continued unexamined influence.

The reality is the mods are not the tip of the spear. There are others mods above them who intervene to set policy and crush off plan posts. A truth this place can never acknowledge.

replies(1): >>dang+u23
◧◩
6. dang+u23[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-08-09 20:02:47
>>dosy+uF1
There are no mods above us and no one intervenes in that way.
[go to top]