zlacker

It's not up to The New Yorker to give praise to moderators or owners. That's inserting bias.

It's up to the readers (us) to determine whether the moderators are doing a good job.

>>cataco+(OP)
I agree with you, but this article certainly had plenty of bias

>>cataco+(OP)
> That's inserting bias.

Are you implying that this article was trying to be bias-free? The author spent entire paragraphs just cherry-picking "toxic" things that have been said on HN to make discussion here look bad.

>>slang8+rl1
That's a very good description of what I mind about the article. Cherry-picking "toxic" things, that's exactly it.