zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. raldi+(OP)[view] [source] 2019-08-08 14:03:56
This seems to have been either a complete, sensationalistic fabrication, or at best, a totally negligent misread.

See for yourself:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19632086

The thread began, "If Katie was a man do you think people would be going through git histories and their published papers trying to determine if she is being over-credited for her achievements?"

And it's not referring to others on HN; as the replies make clear, it's about people elsewhere.

replies(1): >>minima+bg
2. minima+bg[view] [source] 2019-08-08 15:55:24
>>raldi+(OP)
Scroll down to the very bottom of that discussion thread and unfurl the flagged threads.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19634262

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19632301

replies(1): >>raldi+dj
◧◩
3. raldi+dj[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-08-08 16:15:30
>>minima+bg
The comments on that story were nothing like the impression any reader would get from the reporter's description.

Again: "users combed through her code on GitHub"

Reality: One user, in a detached, downvoted, flagged, dead comment invisible to 99% of visitors to the site posted a link to an image analyzing her GH contributions, and was immediately and widely rebuked.

replies(1): >>minima+Nk
◧◩◪
4. minima+Nk[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-08-08 16:26:47
>>raldi+dj
I was in that thread while it was active: it took awhile for those discussions to become "detached, downvoted, flagged, dead".
replies(1): >>raldi+Bl
◧◩◪◨
5. raldi+Bl[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-08-08 16:32:57
>>minima+Nk
That's not what the capture at the Internet Archive appears to show:

http://web.archive.org/web/20190411122008/https://news.ycomb...

[go to top]