zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. whiteo+(OP)[view] [source] 2019-08-08 11:55:12
Why do you think this? Almost every top comment was critical of cloudflare's response for a variety of reasons.
replies(1): >>octoni+l
2. octoni+l[view] [source] 2019-08-08 11:58:53
>>whiteo+(OP)
"whiteopinions", really?
replies(1): >>whiteo+11
◧◩
3. whiteo+11[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-08-08 12:04:50
>>octoni+l
What are you inquisitive about?
replies(1): >>nkurz+kb
◧◩◪
4. nkurz+kb[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-08-08 13:31:33
>>whiteo+11
For starters, why did you choose this username? From your comments it seems like you've been here for a while. Why a new account?
replies(1): >>whiteo+7r
◧◩◪◨
5. whiteo+7r[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-08-08 15:15:45
>>nkurz+kb
Because I like the username. What's wrong with it?

>Why a new account?

Because I wanted the username.

replies(1): >>nkurz+Pw
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. nkurz+Pw[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-08-08 15:57:09
>>whiteo+7r
> What's wrong with it?

Well, it's certainly going to cause many people to discount your opinion because they presume you have an racist agenda. It looks like a username consciously chosen to create offense while being plausibly deniable. Please be cautious of causing harm to a community for sake of social commentary. Needlessly creating offense is a negative, but maybe you can figure out how to use the dissonance to turn it into a net positive.

[go to top]