zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. gizmo6+(OP)[view] [source] 2019-07-16 15:01:19
Real != profitable. Google can offer academic style oppurtunities at industry style salaries.

Eg. Fuchsia OS might have been started because Google saw a bussines oppurtunity in writing an open source capabilities OS. Or, it might have been started to keep smart OS engineers from leaving the company.

replies(1): >>KirinD+R3
2. KirinD+R3[view] [source] 2019-07-16 15:24:30
>>gizmo6+(OP)
It seems fairly ridiculous to suggest that Fuchsia is not a real project. It wouldn't be the first OS Google has built.
replies(1): >>floren+gc
◧◩
3. floren+gc[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-07-16 16:23:15
>>KirinD+R3
What are the others? Android and ChromeOS are both built on the Linux kernel.
replies(2): >>gizmo6+ef >>KirinD+ug
◧◩◪
4. gizmo6+ef[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-07-16 16:43:17
>>floren+gc
Not just Linux, but ChromeOS is based on Gentoo Linux (originally Ubuntu); which is to say, much of the userspace stack was pre-exsting as well. The core of the operating system is the Chrome web browser, which was also a pre-exsting project, which a relatively clear business interest to Google (influence over the web platform).

Android has a bit of a better claim, as more of the userspace stack was written for it. It also wasn't started by Google (although they bought Android Inc. years before it was released publicly).

◧◩◪
5. KirinD+ug[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-07-16 16:52:32
>>floren+gc
They're entirely alternative binary arches with a bunch of patches.

The idea it's just a Linux flavor is sort of like saying iOS is "just a build of OSX". I.e., gross simplification.

[go to top]