zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. shawnz+(OP)[view] [source] 2019-05-04 20:01:25
I think the parent is saying, why not spoof the EDNS client subnet information?
replies(1): >>akerl_+S4
◧
2. akerl_+S4[view] [source] 2019-05-04 20:39:47
>>shawnz+(OP)
True. Copying the information would be possible, but given they’re working on other efforts to replace the functionality of EDNS ECS in a standard way, it seems like a hacky bandaid.
replies(2): >>maniga+Ob >>zamada+Tb
◧◩
3. maniga+Ob[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-05-04 22:03:07
>>akerl_+S4
EDNS is a working system today, doesn't seem that hacky to use it until a new system is actually ready (which doesn't seem to be anytime soon anyway).
replies(1): >>slenk+4j
◧◩
4. zamada+Tb[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-05-04 22:04:52
>>akerl_+S4
Is there anywhere I can learn about these ongoing efforts to replace EDNS?
◧◩◪
5. slenk+4j[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-05-04 23:42:07
>>maniga+Ob
It works if you don't care about privacy
replies(1): >>maniga+Pr
◧◩◪◨
6. maniga+Pr[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-05-05 02:07:13
>>slenk+4j
The suggestion was to use the EDNS of the datacenter server, how does that ruin privacy?
[go to top]