zlacker

Hmmm .. in that case perhaps you're actually arguing against repetition and redundancy?

>>lwhi+(OP)
Sure. But one of the excuses for repetition and redundancy in link content is "we can have a discussion about it," and I only think that's a good excuse if it's a good discussion that we haven't had ten times in the past year already.

>>mquand+J2
Still, that has little to do with politics ;P

Or at least .. little to do with banning political discussion.

I fully agree that a subject can only really be discussed a few times before it's boring - and only a few more after that before it becomes downright annoying - but I think this is a separate issue.

>>lwhi+p4
OK, I think we mostly agree.

>>mquand+X4
Yeah - agreed :)