zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. pedalp+(OP)[view] [source] 2010-11-23 17:36:06
You're missing his point about flagging. Flagging is for trolls, spam, etc. It isn't a 'downvote'. He wants downvoting to be the opposite of upvoting, meaning 'I don't like this' or 'I disagree with this'.

As Matt himself says, it is a nuance that is lost on most.

replies(3): >>mquand+f >>jdminh+q >>nkurz+t
2. mquand+f[view] [source] 2010-11-23 17:39:33
>>pedalp+(OP)
When you use it, it moves posts down, which is exactly the opposite of upvoting! The nuance is lost on me. I don't see why we would be provided with something that acts exactly like a downvote would act, and then expected to use it differently than a downvote.

I also draw no distinction between "spam" and "a link to someone's blog about how they were patted down at the airport." I would just as soon read about free Viagra and watches.

3. jdminh+q[view] [source] 2010-11-23 17:41:12
>>pedalp+(OP)
Flagging is also for things that are off-topic. If he's sick of 20 TSA stories every day, I don't think the flag is the wrong option. I personally flag things I see that are merely political.
4. nkurz+t[view] [source] 2010-11-23 17:42:10
>>pedalp+(OP)
Yes, and a Vice Grips is not a very good wrench, unless you are stuck on the side of the road and have nothing else. Is this nuance or unnecessary idealism? :)
[go to top]