zlacker

but in the factual world, there really aren't these contradictions.

The internal mental furnishings of most human beings are seemingly full of these, however.

>>stcred+(OP)
This is why a factual digital ontology corresponding to the real world would be so valuable as opposed to us fallible human beings.

>>gibson+cp
Really? So why do so many human beings get paid 10's of thousands of dollars a years to exercise theirs, while it's relatively few digital general-purpose "digital ontologies? that are worth paying for.

(The highly contextual ones do pretty well in the market, though.)