zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. rossda+(OP)[view] [source] 2019-01-11 16:36:17
While there is an interesting and relevant point in this article, I feel compelled to point out another possibility: you only comment if you have a POV or opinion not yet represented. If I'm seeing somebody else make the point I thought of making, I upvote it and move on, only spending the time to comment when I don't see it already there.

It would be odd if, after viewing/reading the exact same content, we all had unique opinions of what we just saw or read. It would be pretty bizarre, and probably imply that our communication system wasn't working. It's good to see more than one POV, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't ever have agreement either, and if I see someone has already made the same point, why should I type it in?

Admission: I didn't read absolutely every comment here before typing this; just the top dozen or so. :)

replies(1): >>glitch+cx
2. glitch+cx[view] [source] 2019-01-11 20:34:28
>>rossda+(OP)
I came here to express the same sentiment.
[go to top]