zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. indigo+(OP)[view] [source] 2018-09-24 22:42:19
Even a solid company like Namecheap wouldn't actually be appropriate for a large, enterprise corporation such as Zoho.
replies(2): >>kbd+v3 >>FabioF+c6
◧
2. kbd+v3[view] [source] 2018-09-24 23:19:41
>>indigo+(OP)
Why not?
replies(1): >>thomas+y8
◧
3. FabioF+c6[view] [source] 2018-09-24 23:55:13
>>indigo+(OP)
What would you recommend?
replies(2): >>gbrayu+Z9 >>indigo+ka
◧◩
4. thomas+y8[view] [source] [discussion] 2018-09-25 00:29:01
>>kbd+v3
Probably because you want enterprise grade support, a real person that you can call and will help you solve your problems without having to deal with low level support before.
◧◩
5. gbrayu+Z9[view] [source] [discussion] 2018-09-25 00:53:13
>>FabioF+c6
When I worked as an SRE at Stack Overflow we used name.com for all our domains (and R53/GCP/Azure for DNS). Never had any issues, and worth adding to any short list you come up with.

If you do whois lookups against the top 50 websites you'll see a lot of them use a small set of registrar's. But not all of them accept small businesses.

replies(1): >>akvadr+xW1
◧◩
6. indigo+ka[view] [source] [discussion] 2018-09-25 00:57:53
>>FabioF+c6
Probably something similar to CSC Global.
◧◩◪
7. akvadr+xW1[view] [source] [discussion] 2018-09-25 19:22:47
>>gbrayu+Z9
I use name.com for all my personal domains because it's cheap and supports a lot of unusual TLDs. But I would never trust a $100M company to it. Who cares about saving ~ $100/year.
[go to top]