zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
2 comments
1. spaceh+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2018-08-17 10:53:02
You're wrong on this one. The comment was substantive.
replies(1):
>>dang+CC
◧
2. dang+CC
[view]
[source]
2018-08-17 16:55:49
>>spaceh+(OP)
People seem to agree. Perhaps I read it wrong!
replies(1):
>>pvg+3L
◧◩
3. pvg+3L
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2018-08-17 18:17:55
>>dang+CC
Probably not, given that nobody has managed to explain its supposed insight or wit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMqZ2PPOLik
[go to top]