zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. dotanc+(OP)[view] [source] 2018-07-29 10:29:43
I disagree. Maybe a new tool that downloads and then runs a script from the interwebs needs to be written, but curl itself does one job and does it well.

I.e., curl is a *nix tool.

replies(1): >>laumar+Dm
2. laumar+Dm[view] [source] 2018-07-29 16:07:04
>>dotanc+(OP)
> Maybe a new tool that downloads and then runs a script from the interwebs needs to be written

What you're describing there is a package manager. What we don't need is a tool for running any random script from the wider internet.

replies(2): >>gkya+Qp >>allann+Rt
◧◩
3. gkya+Qp[view] [source] [discussion] 2018-07-29 16:41:53
>>laumar+Dm
Isn't that tool what we call a "user"?
replies(1): >>jchook+J31
◧◩
4. allann+Rt[view] [source] [discussion] 2018-07-29 17:26:25
>>laumar+Dm
Yet Another Package Manager :) Seriously - you're right, but people use curl | bash because it's super simple/fast and usually just works. Package managers can be an intimidating mess; even the choices we have in package managers confound things these days - did I install that with apt? snap? npm? pip? aw, crap that program I just installed with pip isn't working because I'd already installed a version with apt and some of it's configuration isn't compatible!!!

It's a mess. I really like snaps, but I hesitate for this reason - safer to default to apt on my ubuntu machine.

[edit] by safer I meant 'less likely for me to get confused and so screw up something', not meant as a security comment.

◧◩◪
5. jchook+J31[view] [source] [discussion] 2018-07-30 01:29:22
>>gkya+Qp
Sick burn.
[go to top]