zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. frereu+(OP)[view] [source] 2018-05-18 10:43:49
Yeah, this is the confusion - it's difficult to write it out in a way that isn't ambiguous! I think the fact that there are two numbers, the higher of which is the maximum fine, may imply to some people that the lower figure is the minimum - i.e. if 4% of your global turnover is €100m then €20m is the minimum - but of course there in fact isn't a minimum. It might have helped comprehension if there had been an arbitrary minimum figure - say €100 - to anchor the discussions.
replies(2): >>Stavro+A >>irishs+M2
2. Stavro+A[view] [source] 2018-05-18 10:51:46
>>frereu+(OP)
Ah, I see what you mean now. That's not how I understood it, but some people might.
3. irishs+M2[view] [source] 2018-05-18 11:25:19
>>frereu+(OP)
The problem with that is that it would introduce a minimum fine, where currently there doesn't need to be a fine at all (if you coöperate).
[go to top]