zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
6 comments
1. rnnr+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2018-05-18 09:08:21
Plus it gives easy access to the government to peek at your data without any significant clause. Your data are theirs too now.
replies(1):
>>icebra+42
◧
2. icebra+42
[view]
[source]
2018-05-18 09:31:32
>>rnnr+(OP)
That's not how it works. They don't send a guy to look at your databases.
replies(1):
>>rnnr+r3
◧◩
3. rnnr+r3
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2018-05-18 09:46:35
>>icebra+42
So how do they know if the response with the data a user requests, are all we've got about them, and if indeed where stored the proper way?
replies(2):
>>icebra+D5
>>pjc50+K8
◧◩◪
4. icebra+D5
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2018-05-18 10:11:34
>>rnnr+r3
As far as I know, you pay for an audit yourself, and then you send them the results.
replies(1):
>>merino+oz
◧◩◪
5. pjc50+K8
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2018-05-18 10:52:25
>>rnnr+r3
Generally they don't, until something happens that reveals the contrary. Like the Cambridge Analytica fiasco.
◧◩◪◨
6. merino+oz
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2018-05-18 15:05:32
>>icebra+D5
How difficult would be to pay auditor to close their eyes? Do you need another audit?
replies(1):
>>icebra+Wz
◧◩◪◨⬒
7. icebra+Wz
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2018-05-18 15:09:36
>>merino+oz
Sorry, I don't know the details.
[go to top]