zlacker

[parent] [thread] 0 comments
1. peterm+(OP)[view] [source] 2018-04-30 19:22:34
"So you wanna be both a socialist and a libertarian at the same time, and it’s absurd." "But in fact, we’re in a period of time of extreme concentration of wealth and power, and it’s precisely around those who run the biggest computers. So the truth and the effect is just the opposite of what the rhetoric is and the immediate experience." "My feeling is that if the theory is correct that we got into this by trying to be socialist and libertarian at the same time, and getting the worst of both worlds, then we have to choose." "The other option is to monetize it (facebook). And that’s the one that I’m personally more interested in. And what that would look like is, we’d ask those who can afford to — which would be a lot of people in the world, certainly most people in the West — to start paying for it. And then we’d also pay people who provide data into it that’s exceptionally valuable to the network, and it would become a source of economic growth. And we would outlaw advertising on it. There would no longer be third parties paying to influence you."

Sounds like Jaron has Chosen poorly.

[go to top]