zlacker

[parent] [thread] 8 comments
1. throwa+(OP)[view] [source] 2018-01-18 23:41:14
Could constantly identifying oneself as being 'marginalized' contribute to the feeling of being an outsider? As another commenter pointed out, the Kapor Center data is not nearly as damning as this piece suggests. Many of the reported reasons for leaving show similar numbers between genders & races. Sexual harassment is clearly a bigger problem for women than men, but not as drastic as this article claims. The Kapor study shows 10% of women surveyed leaving for sexual harassment, but also shows 8% of men leaving for that reason.
replies(3): >>tomloc+d >>geofft+r1 >>adamse+ig
2. tomloc+d[view] [source] 2018-01-18 23:42:50
>>throwa+(OP)
It could. But what evidence is there of that?
replies(2): >>throwa+e1 >>golemo+E5
◧◩
3. throwa+e1[view] [source] [discussion] 2018-01-18 23:52:08
>>tomloc+d
I have no data here, just posing a question. I think it would be an interesting hypothesis on which to run a survey.

Personally, I've found that self-limiting beliefs have held me back in a number of areas — especially around confidence. Breaking past those has been very important in my life.

4. geofft+r1[view] [source] 2018-01-18 23:53:57
>>throwa+(OP)
If I'm reading the Kapor Center report right (and please correct me if I'm not!), it's about the experiences of people who leave, i.e., it's already selected for people leaving. It's somewhat unsurprising that reasons are broadly similar among these people, and it doesn't really speak to whether (proportionally) more people from one group or another actually leave.

For instance, if 5% of people in category A leave each year, and 30% of people in category B leave each year, and 10% of each of them cite sexual harassment as the reason to leave, I would say that we have a much bigger problem with sexual harassment against category B. (And, at the same time, I would also say that anyone saying that category A doesn't face this problem at all / it's not worth addressing / whatever is wrong!)

◧◩
5. golemo+E5[view] [source] [discussion] 2018-01-19 00:34:06
>>tomloc+d
Every study of confirmation bias. If you see yourself as an outsider you look for evidence of it and it becomes your worldview.
replies(1): >>tomloc+Ha
◧◩◪
6. tomloc+Ha[view] [source] [discussion] 2018-01-19 01:32:18
>>golemo+E5
Alright, but how do you determine it isn't a justified belief?
replies(1): >>golemo+Na
◧◩◪◨
7. golemo+Na[view] [source] [discussion] 2018-01-19 01:33:28
>>tomloc+Ha
The real question is: how would you ever know if it isn't?
replies(1): >>tomloc+bb
◧◩◪◨⬒
8. tomloc+bb[view] [source] [discussion] 2018-01-19 01:37:49
>>golemo+Na
Here's the problem though - how do people determine that they're suitable judges of whether someone is marginalised or not?
9. adamse+ig[view] [source] 2018-01-19 02:34:15
>>throwa+(OP)
I think there are studies that showed if children received messaging about their "inferiority" (in one sense or another) before taking a test, they did worse. [Edit: Ah! The term is "Stereotype Threat": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereotype_threat]

This article was more about the effect of teacher bias in education, however I think there is a study showing bias having a cognitive effect on how students perform.

http://time.com/3705454/teachers-biases-girls-education/

"The impact of unconscious teacher bias is long understood and well-documented. This new research confirms decades of work done by Myra and David Sadker and Karen R. Zittleman. Through thousands of hours of classroom observations, the Sadkers and Zittleman identified specific ways in which implicit and stereotypical ideas about gender govern classroom dynamics. They, as others have, found that teachers spend up to two thirds of their time talking to male students; they also are more likely to interrupt girls but allow boys to talk over them. Teachers also tend to acknowledge girls but praise and encourage boys. They spend more time prompting boys to seek deeper answers while rewarding girls for being quiet. Boys are also more frequently called to the front of the class for demonstrations. When teachers ask questions, they direct their gaze towards boys more often, especially when the questions are open-ended. Biases such as these are at the root of why the United States has one of the world’s largest gender gaps in math and science performance. Until they view their videotaped interactions, teachers believe they are being balanced in their exchanges.

The two reports released last week were focused on girls. However, the same biases have been implicated in teachers unconsciously undermining boys’ interest in the arts and language, enabling harmful gender gaps in self-regulation, and tacitly accepting certain male students’ propensity to believe that studying is “for girls” – all factors that contribute to boys’ lower academic performance."

[go to top]