zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. EGreg+(OP)[view] [source] 2018-01-16 17:51:05
Perhaps because Facebook provides an easy and fairly reliable way to determine someone's sex. Many projects including dating sites have relied on it to do authentication for this reason.
replies(3): >>aphext+Z >>proble+u1 >>glorkk+l3
2. aphext+Z[view] [source] 2018-01-16 17:57:35
>>EGreg+(OP)
And it’s awful. This trend needs to stop. Facebook is an ad tracking platform, not a universal authentication scheme.
3. proble+u1[view] [source] 2018-01-16 17:59:43
>>EGreg+(OP)
I fail to see how it'd be good for this use - do they require a number of friends or something? I have 4 Facebook accounts for faking out exactly this kind of stuff, but none with any real information.
replies(1): >>EGreg+Fc
4. glorkk+l3[view] [source] 2018-01-16 18:07:48
>>EGreg+(OP)
A sizeable and growing portion of the population refuses to have any dealing with this shady corporation. Facebook is not a universal authentication platform and never will be.
replies(1): >>beat+Jo
◧◩
5. EGreg+Fc[view] [source] [discussion] 2018-01-16 18:56:11
>>proble+u1
Presumably most people are not like you and have only one account. The site can make sure you have had an account for at least a year and your sex is female. Otherwise you may want to fake it to get in.

It's the most reliable "easy" way I know to determine this info. I remember an app called Lulu which did the same.

◧◩
6. beat+Jo[view] [source] [discussion] 2018-01-16 19:59:19
>>glorkk+l3
There isn't a universal authentication platform. Facebook is closer than most. And Facebook is strong for this in the interest of getting something out the door, to be improved later.
[go to top]