zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. abeced+(OP)[view] [source] 2018-01-11 21:22:16
The comment you're dismissing gave a reason talented Chinese colleagues take themselves elsewhere. (I don't have firsthand knowledge of how true it is.) If true, it's worth knowing, whether or not it's a "reactionary statement".
replies(1): >>drb91+5b2
2. drb91+5b2[view] [source] 2018-01-12 21:16:22
>>abeced+(OP)
Exactly :)

Of course, I wasn't dismissing anyone! Read more carefully. And, they were kind enough to actually clarify, and I appreciated their comment.

Not every discussion about political words must be political itself.

[go to top]