zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. knowno+(OP)[view] [source] 2018-01-11 20:53:20
It'd be nice if you could link to the studies so we can check them out. I've seen a decent amount of criticism on this topic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicit-association_test#Crit...
replies(1): >>krasta+f2
2. krasta+f2[view] [source] 2018-01-11 21:08:23
>>knowno+(OP)
In one of the sibling comments I linked to a good page on those.

There is valid concern on how predictive the implicit bias test is in non-test conditions. But "implicit bias" is only the start of the conversation - it is one easy thing to measure in a sea of difficult to measure issues. If you want to jump into this rabbit hole, I have found the researches that work in this field to be eager to describe their more up-to-date work on addressing them (I do try to play a devil's advocate in such conversations and have gained much respect for their rigor). Regrettably, as usual in academia, the easies way to be exposed to those conversations is not that easy: going to talks given by those researchers.

replies(1): >>knowno+Ig
◧◩
3. knowno+Ig[view] [source] [discussion] 2018-01-11 22:42:18
>>krasta+f2
Thanks, I'll take a look.
[go to top]