zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
2 comments
1. user59+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2017-12-09 19:48:16
Postgre doesn't handle hundreds of TB of data.
replies(2):
>>anaraz+L6
>>nl+2h
◧
2. anaraz+L6
[view]
[source]
2017-12-09 20:58:09
>>user59+(OP)
It's postgres or postgresql, not postgre.
◧
3. nl+2h
[view]
[source]
2017-12-09 23:15:04
>>user59+(OP)
10 years ago it could handle 2PB.
https://www.computerworld.com/article/2535825/business-intel...
[go to top]