zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. drb91+(OP)[view] [source] 2017-12-09 18:13:58
You could knowingly publish incorrect, fictional, or fabricated results. When they sue, you won’t have violated any license. But at least oracle will look terrible.
replies(2): >>saghm+86 >>vijayr+Tf
2. saghm+86[view] [source] 2017-12-09 19:15:10
>>drb91+(OP)
Then they'll just sue for libel instead
replies(1): >>drb91+3n1
3. vijayr+Tf[view] [source] 2017-12-09 20:54:50
>>drb91+(OP)
This sounds like a terrible idea. Maybe if one is a 15 year old kid, sure, for shits and giggles. Why would a researcher do this, damaging their reputation in the process? And what good does it serve anyone?
replies(1): >>drb91+Xm1
◧◩
4. drb91+Xm1[view] [source] [discussion] 2017-12-10 17:24:01
>>vijayr+Tf
Mostly because it’s a better world than one where Oracle can control the image of their shitty db.
◧◩
5. drb91+3n1[view] [source] [discussion] 2017-12-10 17:24:47
>>saghm+86
You can clearly label it ad fictional and explain. Really the point here is to have some portrayal of oracle’s performance that is legal but pisses off Oracle.
[go to top]