zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. greens+(OP)[view] [source] 2017-08-02 17:50:58
Uh, you don't know what the ex-con hasn't been caught for either. Maybe they got away with murder 10 years ago, but where only caught for their petty theft 5 years later.
replies(1): >>jmcdie+B6
2. jmcdie+B6[view] [source] 2017-08-02 18:35:19
>>greens+(OP)
Which also undermines the usefulness of judging based on criminal record...
replies(1): >>aeorgn+fc
◧◩
3. aeorgn+fc[view] [source] [discussion] 2017-08-02 19:14:34
>>jmcdie+B6
How is that? It seems reasonable to believe, all else being equal, that someone that's been convicted of a crime has committed more crimes than someone that hasn't been convicted.
replies(1): >>jmcdie+hV
◧◩◪
4. jmcdie+hV[view] [source] [discussion] 2017-08-03 02:25:30
>>aeorgn+fc
Why? Being caught committing a crime is less a sign of committing a crime but in doing it in a way that got you caught. Serial committers often go years uncaught... from petty burglars to assaulters.. a lot of people get caught their first time, its the ones who dont get caught that are more dangerous...
[go to top]