zlacker

In a past job I was responsible for hiring a few warehouse workers, and in one case I was actually relieved to find that the applicant was on probation for a drug charge, and was required to submit to weekly urine tests. Basically the state was paying to guarantee that this worker was staying clean, and so I was pretty confident about hiring him. I wonder if other employers would be interested in that kind of info as well.

>>triang+(OP)
Very interesting take on this

>>triang+(OP)
Considering the number of friends who repeatedly and confidently pass state mandated drug tests, I would not trust that at all.

>>triang+(OP)
Great point. I think the problem is that employers often use boilerplate conditions, and requirements are more stringent than the job would require.

>>RBBron+9
Urinalysis as a service has got to be a thing already. Probably a partnership deal. Maybe LabCorp or Quest. Just stay away from Theranos :) If not, we could probably russle you up a chemist if you're willing to front the immunoassays and mass spectrometer. Or microfluidics. Then Theranos might be interested...