zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. semi-e+(OP)[view] [source] 2017-02-28 15:54:00
I agree talking to IT is step 1, and I'm assuming that hasn't worked.

Collective action (strikes, "work slowly protests" etc.) as a protest against company policy has a long precedent of a) being protected by law and b) being much more effective than a single employee quitting, while simultaneously reducing the downside for employees (in L_\infty norm).

Edit: the old Keynes quote comes to mind: "if you owe the bank $100 you have a problem, but if you owe the bank $100 million the bank has a problem" -- if 1 of the company's devs commits a "fireable offense", he/she has a problem, but if 100 of them do, the company has a problem.

replies(1): >>raesen+ne
2. raesen+ne[view] [source] 2017-02-28 17:28:08
>>semi-e+(OP)
However with collective action, the company is usually aware of their employees actions, here if I'm reading correctly management were not notified that this was happening, so perhaps not quote the same thing.
[go to top]