zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. acdha+(OP)[view] [source] 2017-02-28 03:05:32
Think about how that conversation would go. They're driven by concerns that kids will look at porn – and remember that if they don't try to stop that, the local Fox News applicate will be running a loop 24x7 saying they're trying to force godly children to watch it – or that someone will breach a staff member's computer and steal PII, compromise the security cameras, etc.

Against that, making life hard for Chrome engineers’ aggressive upgrade campaign is pretty hard sell. “Buy a better box” perhaps but I don't see a viable argument for “don't monitor”.

replies(1): >>habitu+Kd
2. habitu+Kd[view] [source] 2017-02-28 06:05:59
>>acdha+(OP)
Just an FYI, local fox affiliates don't have the ideological bent of the cable station. They're often run by entirely different companies
replies(1): >>acdha+hP
◧◩
3. acdha+hP[view] [source] [discussion] 2017-02-28 14:35:28
>>habitu+Kd
True. In the areas where I've lived they were reliably the most breathless of local TV news cycle but that's a limited sample size.
[go to top]