zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
2 comments
1. ralph+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2007-04-17 13:33:47
How about * yielding *.
Cheers, Ralph.
replies(1):
>>jey+4U5
◧
2. jey+4U5
[view]
[source]
2007-07-24 11:41:18
>>ralph+(OP)
This hack worked great until the recent change that stopped the evaluation of sequences of * and &. Again there's no way to get a literal asterisk that I know of.
replies(1):
>>rplevy+o3X
◧◩
3. rplevy+o3X
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2008-07-09 01:43:28
>>jey+4U5
I second this, I can't find any way to display an asterisk.
[go to top]