zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
5 comments
1. bitmap+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2017-01-13 03:42:35
I wonder how many people thought app.net was a Microsoft product.
replies(4):
>>WildUt+K3
>>mypalm+6d
>>jyrian+in
>>intove+qq
◧
2. WildUt+K3
[view]
[source]
2017-01-13 04:50:57
>>bitmap+(OP)
Any association with the SharePoint people could and should doom a social network product. Or any product.
replies(1):
>>rbanff+7f
◧
3. mypalm+6d
[view]
[source]
2017-01-13 07:21:07
>>bitmap+(OP)
Yeah, the name is confusing. It's like a pizza place named "Waffle Irons Direct".
◧◩
4. rbanff+7f
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2017-01-13 07:58:37
>>WildUt+K3
I like to call it ShamePoint. Nobody can possibly be proud of deploying that.
◧
5. jyrian+in
[view]
[source]
2017-01-13 09:59:44
>>bitmap+(OP)
I thought it's some kind of app store for android phones. Not sure why I made this association. But I guess their name might be one of the reasons of failure. It's simple and short, but doesn't really tell anything about the product.
◧
6. intove+qq
[view]
[source]
2017-01-13 10:49:43
>>bitmap+(OP)
Always felt like a case where they bought the domain name for another reason then one day decided to build a twitter clone.
Branding wise is made absolutely no sense.
[go to top]