zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. joelwi+(OP)[view] [source] 2017-01-05 18:58:36
The case against Standard Oil was pretty explicitly because of anticompetitive behaviour, not price inefficiency.
replies(1): >>arrose+77
2. arrose+77[view] [source] 2017-01-05 19:44:19
>>joelwi+(OP)
The anti-competitive behavior was creating price inefficiency. Standard Oil owned almost the entire refinery market, and they were colluding with railroads so they effectively owned distribution. This vertical alignment meant they could effectively set whatever price they wanted because there was no other game in town.
[go to top]