zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. mring3+(OP)[view] [source] 2017-01-05 17:11:10
I'm pretty sure that, in the USA, choosing to click ads would be protected under the first amendment.
replies(2): >>ggggte+qs >>DanBC+As
◧
2. ggggte+qs[view] [source] 2017-01-05 19:52:09
>>mring3+(OP)
You'd be wrong. Many people, even Americans, don't really understand that freedom of speech doesn't mean you can do and say anything you want regardless of the context or consequences.
replies(1): >>ben0x5+Xx
◧
3. DanBC+As[view] [source] 2017-01-05 19:53:37
>>mring3+(OP)
Has a US government agency tried to stop anyone clicking ads?
◧◩
4. ben0x5+Xx[view] [source] [discussion] 2017-01-05 20:30:52
>>ggggte+qs
I suspect the comment is a frustrated response to American courts declaring that all kinds of weird things are somehow protected as "speech", not an unironic endorsement of the practice.
[go to top]