zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. morgan+(OP)[view] [source] 2016-12-07 04:39:31
I know that dang has been making a concerted effort to encourage the Principle of Charity, something which I definitely commend.

That actually could be a good way to moderate political threads by requiring an even higher standard of conduct. So you must not merely be civil, but actively apply Rapoport's Rules.

replies(1): >>grzm+6
2. grzm+6[view] [source] 2016-12-07 04:42:42
>>morgan+(OP)
Cool! Wonder if it would be worth mentioning it in the guidelines. I can see keeping them relatively brief is worth something, as well.

I can imagine pushback along the lines of enforcing speech rules, which I'm somewhat sympathetic to. That said, I think keeping them in mind is worth it.

replies(1): >>morgan+x
◧◩
3. morgan+x[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-07 04:53:38
>>grzm+6
> I can imagine pushback along the lines of enforcing speech rules, which I'm somewhat sympathetic to.

That's why I suggest this higher standard for only political threads. It's a lot better than banning them entirely.

replies(1): >>grzm+f1
◧◩◪
4. grzm+f1[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-07 05:06:33
>>morgan+x
Oh, yeah, I understood that. Even some of the long-established users on the site react strongly when they feel their free speech is being encroached upon. I still think it'd be worth a try. (After all, I brought them up :) I know it makes me more understanding of others arguments, not dismissing them in a knee-jerk fashion.
[go to top]