zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. chris_+(OP)[view] [source] 2016-12-06 09:38:19
You don't do that anymore. Your correspondence has increasingly turned into approbation and you show an unwillingness to explain why someone is even rate limited.
replies(1): >>dang+91
2. dang+91[view] [source] 2016-12-06 09:51:23
>>chris_+(OP)
I realize the rate limit is upsetting you, but we've given you a ton of explanation and detailed information about what you need to do in order to have it lifted. Instead you've been doing the opposite. I'm not sure why that is, but it would be good if you'd stop.
replies(1): >>chris_+2i1
◧◩
3. chris_+2i1[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-06 21:09:21
>>dang+91
I can publish our correspondence if you'd like, perhaps others can say what you told me I need to do?
[go to top]