zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. tripzi+(OP)[view] [source] 2016-12-05 23:27:32
I also often see this when someone argues that a certain action by a company isn't ethical--which has no objective truth, but that makes the debate only more fruitful, IMO--and someone else then replies that this company has every (legal) right to act this way, which has more of an objective truth by most standards, but isn't very interesting at all if you don't live in the same jurisdiction, nor has it much relevance to whether the action was "right" (in the ethical sense) or not.

But then, I guess, that person has every right to conflate moral and legal rights ... so sue me? :)

replies(1): >>7952+Pr1
2. 7952+Pr1[view] [source] 2016-12-06 17:31:17
>>tripzi+(OP)
Yes, I have lost count of the rants against "natural products". People develop these buying habits in response to an inabilty to hold complete information about a product. So you have to have shortcuts based on your world view. For every organic lover there is someone slurping Soylant.
[go to top]