zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. tripzi+(OP)[view] [source] 2016-12-05 22:33:32
Because they're political comments on tech issues. They have given me new insights on numerous occasions. And I love all counterarguments, especially when they go against beliefs I hold dearly.

And it's not just about finding out that I'm completely wrong. Sometimes it's just a new light, and sometimes it's just the reminder that really smart people too believe some things that I didn't think were possible for a "reasonable smart person" to believe (if you don't think you need constant reminding of this, ... well ... haha ;-) )

replies(1): >>static+Q2
2. static+Q2[view] [source] 2016-12-05 22:54:53
>>tripzi+(OP)
I agree with your sentiments. But this is only for one week right? Let's suck it up and see how it goes?

I trust that the admins want the best for the community.

replies(2): >>mattne+g4 >>tripzi+16
◧◩
3. mattne+g4[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-05 23:03:56
>>static+Q2
And I don't envy the admin's job!

I know I could just be very sensitive to anything that smells like censorship right now, and that could be coloring my visceral reaction here.

Still, I afraid of this becoming a thing. One week is a while and while I don't think the mods would ever dream of intentionally doing this, it could happen during important events.

It is really hard for me to imagine what metrics after the fact would justify this. How do you measure the effect of self censorship has on influencing people's beliefs here?

I am worried that this will generate some numbers that seem to justify the practice and it becomes a regular practice around politically charged events.

◧◩
4. tripzi+16[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-05 23:17:27
>>static+Q2
> I agree with your sentiments. But this is only for one week right? Let's suck it up and see how it goes?

Yes, absolutely! I said this in another comment, I'm curious to see how this experiment goes but I'm also glad it's just for one week :)

[go to top]