zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. fweesp+(OP)[view] [source] 2016-12-05 21:26:25
Yeah, it honestly seems like HN should split into two forums effectively.

Tech (No politics, etc.) / Not Tech.

The trying to force it all into a single view seems to be creating some friction.

replies(2): >>dang+V >>trowaw+g1
2. dang+V[view] [source] 2016-12-05 21:32:10
>>fweesp+(OP)
The distinction isn't tech/notech. That's the most important thing to understand about this whole site!

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

I do think the purely political forum that a minority of users here seem to want, would best be served by a different site.

replies(2): >>superq+R3 >>fweesp+5N1
3. trowaw+g1[view] [source] 2016-12-05 21:34:00
>>fweesp+(OP)
Except, as tons of people have already pointed out, there is no way to talk about tech without talking about politics. Is research about how the Google search algorithm or Facebook's news feed shapes users' opinions tech or not-tech? Is a story about Uber researching autonomous cars with the intention of eliminating drivers in its own industry and industries like trucking tech or not-tech?
replies(1): >>gbog+ar
◧◩
4. superq+R3[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-05 21:50:18
>>dang+V
The very niche "I want to argue politics, but only with other hackers" site!
replies(1): >>gregli+Eb
◧◩◪
5. gregli+Eb[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-05 22:43:52
>>superq+R3
Which only applies to part of HN readers; from reading the comments here, many hackers appear to dislike the political arguments which take places on HN.
◧◩
6. gbog+ar[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-06 01:19:01
>>trowaw+g1
I think for HN becoming less political do not mean avoiding topics with a social impact, it means avoiding the display of personal political preferences in discussions.

For example "why did Trump win" is a political topic that can be discussed on HN the HN way: share confirmed figures and stats, links to informed opinions, bundle these together to form an explanation and test its predictiveness on other similar cases. All of that can happen without anyone ever stating their own personal (dis)taste for Trump. (Edited for typos)

◧◩
7. fweesp+5N1[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-06 17:55:39
>>dang+V
> I do think the purely political forum that a minority of users here seem to want, would best be served by a different site.

Privacy issues, opinions on hiring practices, etc. are all topics that have heavy polarized sides with little to bridge the divide and would likely benefit from a shift in separating those topics from the solidly tech related ones.

Although, to be honest, I'm more concerned with the fact you are oblivious to this than I am about the fact you call change ignorance. I guess it does not really matter, I'll be off HN for a long while.

[go to top]