zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. ythn+(OP)[view] [source] 2016-12-05 21:18:58
Thank you. I have a million places I can go for political discussion. Why does HN have to be one of them?
replies(1): >>daptaq+17
2. daptaq+17[view] [source] 2016-12-05 22:05:14
>>ythn+(OP)
One could argue, that when you live in a democracy, politics are a necessary duty for every citizen. For a democracy to flourish, no place, no topic, no time should be unfit for discussion, because if you forbid politics, you just manifest the status quo, which doesn't have to be a-political!
replies(1): >>olalon+ji
◧◩
3. olalon+ji[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-05 23:24:29
>>daptaq+17
> For a democracy to flourish, no place should be unfit for discussion

This is obviously false. For example, plenty of democracies have flourished despite having libraries where silence is golden.

> One could argue, that when you live in a democracy, politics are a necessary duty for every citizen.

HN is international and if I recall correctly, more than half of users are not from the USA. Some users don't live in a democracy and some don't believe in it.

replies(2): >>aaronb+An >>daptaq+h01
◧◩◪
4. aaronb+An[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-06 00:19:41
>>olalon+ji
Libraries and librarians tend to be opposed to censorship of what they may contain.

> Some users don't live in a democracy and some don't believe in it.

I look forward to arguing with monarchists about their views at some point in the future, then.

◧◩◪
5. daptaq+h01[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-06 10:20:52
>>olalon+ji
>For example, plenty of democracies have flourished despite having libraries where silence is golden.

There is a difference between "not allowed to speak" and "not allowed to speak about politics". You can't speak under water, but a pond isn't the proof that democracy can't exist.

[go to top]