zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. mjg59+(OP)[view] [source] 2016-12-05 20:48:10
Hi dang,

Quick question for clarification - would http://www.wsj.com/articles/tech-companies-delay-diversity-r... fall into the kind of race and gender issues that you'd block this week?

replies(3): >>tptace+32 >>exstud+Pc >>dang+1W
2. tptace+32[view] [source] 2016-12-05 21:00:02
>>mjg59+(OP)
I can't answer for 'dang but I would definitely flag that post during a "political detox week".

Also: HN threads on that particular topic (statistical evidence for diversity in the industry and its impact) are invariably a shitshow here. I am guessing your political leanings w/r/t/ industry diversity are identical to mine, and I do not see what HN generally gains from the trolling and nastiness that occurs on "diversity as a phenomenon" threads.

replies(1): >>mjg59+45
◧◩
3. mjg59+45[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-05 21:17:00
>>tptace+32
The solution to "Certain types of story result in unpleasant arguments" doesn't have to be "Prevent that type of story from being visible". Media sites will happily disable comments on certain stories, but haven't extended that to not reporting on those stories in the first place.
replies(1): >>ekiru+bo1
4. exstud+Pc[view] [source] 2016-12-05 22:07:54
>>mjg59+(OP)
That you're actively trying to stir up drama about this on Twitter demonstrates why HN may be best off leaving these discussions to other forums (and I say this as someone fairly active in the discussions in question).

It will be nice to see HN minus the outrage and Twitter/social media drama/witch-hunting.

5. dang+1W[view] [source] 2016-12-06 08:00:51
>>mjg59+(OP)
Sorry I didn't see this earlier. That's a tough one. On the one hand it's a substantive news story on a subject of core interest to HN. On the other hand it's bound to result in a highly politicized discussion, if not a poster child for the kind of flamewar we're trying to avoid. So I don't have a good answer for you.

Since we asked people to err on the side of flagging for just this week, I don't think we can ask them not to flag that one. It would be fine to post it next week though.

◧◩◪
6. ekiru+bo1[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-06 14:20:46
>>mjg59+45
It doesn't have to be, but it may be that it still should be the solution to that problem. It makes sense for, for example, news sites to disable comments on some stories because the comments aren't the most valuable portion of the site: the news is.

But I think that in large part the value of HN is in the comments. If HN isn't able to discuss a story productively, what's the point of that story being on HN?

replies(1): >>mjg59+QS1
◧◩◪◨
7. mjg59+QS1[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-06 17:49:29
>>ekiru+bo1
Because the subject is interesting and the content informative?
replies(1): >>tptace+6f2
◧◩◪◨⬒
8. tptace+6f2[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-06 20:28:00
>>mjg59+QS1
Why not start the site that engages with the intersection of politics and technology more directly? I'd be happy to participate.
[go to top]