zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. Frondo+(OP)[view] [source] 2016-12-05 20:18:53
The problem I see is that everything is politics, because politics is the air we breathe as a society. It's asking the question of how we live in community.

I think what dang is after getting of is tribalism, where people show group membership with displays of insults, meme-dropping, etc.

Different things, but if any group can separate tribalism from politics, through thoughtful community-making, I'd say HN can.

replies(2): >>ada198+47 >>steved+961
2. ada198+47[view] [source] 2016-12-05 20:57:07
>>Frondo+(OP)
This is getting closer to the answer.
replies(1): >>icebra+M7
◧◩
3. icebra+M7[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-05 21:00:52
>>ada198+47
http://www.goreading.net/Red%20Mars/24.html
4. steved+961[view] [source] 2016-12-06 09:09:45
>>Frondo+(OP)
Very useful distinction. One mark of tribalism is a set of knee-jerk responses and stock vocabulary. If people could at least check in their tribal phrases, we would have better conversations. For example: 'racists', 'crybullies', 'deplorables' and so forth. Although left-libertarian, I don't hold with all this 'no platforming' nonsense, for instance. Leave the words behind, and find less loaded terms in an attempt at recovering public discourse
replies(1): >>Chris2+hs1
◧◩
5. Chris2+hs1[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-12-06 14:08:46
>>steved+961
Here's the thing though, what is a reasonable alternative to 'SJW' - those that employ deplorable, emotive tactics in progressive topics, with the implication of self-aggrandizement. Maybe we need a solid vocab with established definitions.
[go to top]