Can we please, please stop saying that things are "ultra secure" before they've been adequately beaten on? Saying that your goal is a very high level of security is fine (I do the same), but saying that directly translates to security out the gate is very deceptive. This has great potential for security, but it's not known to be secure yet; only time will give you that.
>>daeken+(OP)
I fear your goal will be achieved in the computer press about the same time the tabloids stop giving us headlines such as "HEADLESS BODY IN TOPLESS BAR" (the New York Post on a murder in 1983).