zlacker

[parent] [thread] 13 comments
1. shurco+(OP)[view] [source] 2016-04-09 04:13:29
Did I understand what you said at the end correctly, are you willing to commit to buy 8 million dollars worth of laptops?
replies(2): >>rdl+8 >>Rorith+n
2. rdl+8[view] [source] 2016-04-09 04:15:10
>>shurco+(OP)
Yes. (and then sell them, obviously, ideally for much more than $8mm)
replies(2): >>Drdrdr+A5 >>robk+Na
3. Rorith+n[view] [source] 2016-04-09 04:20:11
>>shurco+(OP)
Thats what happens if you take your privacy seriously. You buy one-off Laptops that you can use like paper tissues.
◧◩
4. Drdrdr+A5[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-04-09 06:30:40
>>rdl+8
You think there is a market for 10k of those? </sceptic>
replies(2): >>rdl+66 >>jimhef+he
◧◩◪
5. rdl+66[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-04-09 06:40:45
>>Drdrdr+A5
Not as random laptops, no.
replies(1): >>Drdrdr+78
◧◩◪◨
6. Drdrdr+78[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-04-09 07:30:19
>>rdl+66
If you see a market oppurtunity like this, I suggest you go for it. There are many companies which will make you a custom laptop for such a quantity. Good luck!
replies(1): >>vinceg+Qh
◧◩
7. robk+Na[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-04-09 08:46:01
>>rdl+8
This is a perfect scenario to test the demand will kickstarter
◧◩◪
8. jimhef+he[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-04-09 10:41:25
>>Drdrdr+A5
I'd seriously consider it. It would not be a sole criteria, but it is important to me.
◧◩◪◨⬒
9. vinceg+Qh[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-04-09 12:26:18
>>Drdrdr+78
The problem is the brand specification. Nobody wants unbranded laptops.
replies(1): >>sbarre+Ij
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
10. sbarre+Ij[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-04-09 13:13:58
>>vinceg+Qh
I (anecdotally) disagree. I'd love to have a good-spec laptop that had no logos or branding on it.
replies(2): >>irixus+Um >>vinceg+ao
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
11. irixus+Um[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-04-09 14:09:25
>>sbarre+Ij
Agreed. I love Apple's hardware (much more than their user interface), but I dislike being in public with a giant glowing half eaten apple.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
12. vinceg+ao[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-04-09 14:30:34
>>sbarre+Ij
It's not so much the logos or the branding, it's the build quality. I used to run Ubuntu on old ThinkPads, ditched it like an ugly girlfriend once I could afford a Macbook Pro. Old ThinkPads were a step up from commodity PC laptops, which were a step up from desktops. In a brief fit of FOSS zeal I bought a System76 Galago Pro, but the build quality was so inferior to a Macbook Pro that I relegated it to desktop duty. If I felt the need to move off of Apple hardware for whatever reason for my primary ride, it'd be back to a ThinkPad.

Rdl specified Dell or Lenovo also for the reason that the supply chain for those two ecosystems are well-developed enough that providing customer support won't be a huge hassle.

replies(1): >>sbarre+Wc3
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
13. sbarre+Wc3[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-04-11 15:33:40
>>vinceg+ao
I totally agree with what you're saying here.. That's why I sand "good spec" laptop. ;-)

But yes the question is whether or not that actually exists.

replies(1): >>vinceg+qM3
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
14. vinceg+qM3[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-04-11 19:24:42
>>sbarre+Wc3
If there was then System76 would be using that provider. Actually, if there was, then everybody else's laptops wouldn't be so horrible, either.
[go to top]