zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. brudge+(OP)[view] [source] 2016-01-26 14:47:06
The user dang is the moderator. A charitable reading of his comment would be that dang was relieved that someone else was responding to the subthread in a way consistent with his sense of how people should act on Hacker News.

Meta-discussion of the black bar is intellectually uninteresting at best. Off topic in the middle. And disrespectful of people's grief at worst. The least of these is reason enough to downvote.

replies(1): >>Jupite+EA
2. Jupite+EA[view] [source] 2016-01-26 20:38:53
>>brudge+(OP)
I know very well that dang is a moderator. I had expected that a moderator would actually consider the site's own guidelines when someone displays what they describe in their own words as "regular aggression with sarcasm"+.

+ https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10973857

replies(2): >>brudge+oG >>dang+io1
◧◩
3. brudge+oG[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-01-26 21:24:47
>>Jupite+EA
I don't read it that way.
◧◩
4. dang+io1[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-01-27 08:28:55
>>Jupite+EA
My comment was posted before mikeash described his comment that way, so unless you think we should be mind-readers, that's a hindsight fallacy. I never dreamt he was being sarcastic. In fact I still can't read his comment that way—to me it remains a striking expression of the right values of this site.

If I squint, I guess I can see that use of the word "civilized" as a bit aggressive, but really I think Mike was being hyperbolic for effect in his later description.

[go to top]