zlacker

[parent] [thread] 10 comments
1. andrew+(OP)[view] [source] 2016-01-24 14:30:57
Boiling water?

3kW isn't a magic number for the kettle, it's just the amount of power you can get away with drawing when you've got a 240V supply rated at 13A. The more power, the faster the water boils.

As I understand it, freestanding kettles are much less popular in North America, presumably because a hob can draw more power?

replies(3): >>sliver+q2 >>peatmo+r6 >>maxeri+68
2. sliver+q2[view] [source] 2016-01-24 15:24:04
>>andrew+(OP)
North america just doesn't use as much hot water as Asia and Britain. No tea or instant foods. Pasta must be boiled, coffee is usually made in a dedicated device...
replies(1): >>moogly+i4
◧◩
3. moogly+i4[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-01-24 16:00:37
>>sliver+q2
I (and I thought most people) preboil pasta water in a kettle. Then I can start cooking the pasta within 2 minutes instead of 15.
replies(2): >>julien+po >>polyno+4t
4. peatmo+r6[view] [source] 2016-01-24 16:41:45
>>andrew+(OP)
Have lived in both New Zealand and US and made regular use of water kettles. I'm not sure if popularity is a function performance (or if there are other cultural reasons) but I can confirm that water kettles connected to 240V are way more awesome... P=IV and all.

This extends to home espresso makers. Some international models of home espresso makers get rave reviews in AU/NZ, but lackluster reviews in the US. Only so many watts you can get on 120V before you exceed amperage constraints.

5. maxeri+68[view] [source] 2016-01-24 17:10:40
>>andrew+(OP)
Yeah, stovetops are generally wired to a dedicated 240V circuit or are gas.
◧◩◪
6. julien+po[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-01-24 21:27:26
>>moogly+i4
You can also just boil your pasta in the kettle.
replies(1): >>moogly+Oo1
◧◩◪
7. polyno+4t[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-01-24 22:36:37
>>moogly+i4
How does this work? If you are using the exact same heat source, then the only difference seems to be the metal/composition/thickness of the kettle vs. a cooking pot. Which doesn't intuitively seem like it will save 13 minutes out of 15.
replies(3): >>Symbio+A61 >>moogly+1p1 >>koide+5N1
◧◩◪◨
8. Symbio+A61[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-01-25 12:41:38
>>polyno+4t
You'll always save time with an electric kettle — it's likely to be better-insulated, have a lid, and the heating element is in contact with the water. It will still take 4-5 minutes though, even with a powerful kettle.

In case you're not familiar with them, we're discussing something like [1], or, to show these are very widespread commodity appliances, [2], which costs $7 including tax.

[1] http://www.amazon.co.uk/Andrew-James-Cordless-Indicator-Warr...

[2] http://www.argos.co.uk/static/Product/partNumber/9016710.htm

◧◩◪◨
9. moogly+Oo1[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-01-25 16:16:03
>>julien+po
I don't think you can get an electric kettle without automatic shutdown at boiling point in Europe. At least, I've never seen one.
◧◩◪◨
10. moogly+1p1[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-01-25 16:17:05
>>polyno+4t
An induction stove with booster function will come close to the performance of an electric kettle, but I don't have one of those. Any other type of hob will heat water a lot slower.
◧◩◪◨
11. koide+5N1[view] [source] [discussion] 2016-01-25 19:50:56
>>polyno+4t
I guess he means an electric water heater...
[go to top]